Ibrahim Magu says he waited for at least ten hours on Monday, July 13 and was taken back to custody without facing the Presidential Committee on Audit of Recovered Assets (PCARA).
The suspended chairman of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) said that the same thing took place yesterday and had previously happened on July 9 and 10, making it four days.
READ ALSO
According to Mr Magu, he last appeared before the panel one week ago.
His lawyer, Wahab Shittu, revealed the concerns of his client in a letter to the panel on Wednesday.
Mr Shittu said the clarification became necessary after it was reported that Mr Magu was grilled by the panel on Monday.
He added that the suspended EFCC boss was yet to officially receive a copy of the allegations against him, expressing displeasure that “some of these allegations are flying around on social media platforms with prejudicial consequences”.
The lawyer requested the panel to ask the inspector-general of police to release Mr Magu from custody to enable him to “prepare for his defence and attend to his failing health”.
The letter reads in part: “The allegation that our client was grilled by the Panel on Monday, 13th July, 2020, as reported above is a complete falsehood.
“The correct position was that our client and his Counsel (Mr. Wahab Shittu) arrived the venue of the ongoing Investigations on Monday 13th July, 2020 by 9am.
“Our client and his Counsel were kept at the waiting room of the venue of the sittings unattended to from 9am to 9pm when our client was taken back to custody.
“This followed the same pattern on Thursday and Friday last week when our client waited for 12 hours without being called upon by the Panel to partake in the proceedings.
“Witnesses called by the Panel were interrogated by the Panel without the participation of our client or his Counsel in the proceedings. This was also the pattern on Tuesday, 14th July, 2020. Our client chose to wait patiently on the panel.
“Our client is spending the 9th day in custody without being given copy of the allegations against him to enable him formally respond to same. Our client is ready to formally respond to allegations and furnish documentary evidence in support if served with the copy of the allegations.
“Our client respectfully demands the following: A copy of the report of the Presidential Audit Committee; a copy of the memo of HAGF to the President on our client; individual Petitions submitted to the Panel against our client.
“Our client observes that rather being afforded copies of the allegations against him, some of these allegations are flying round on social media platforms with prejudicial consequences.
Our client observes that the Panel has issued official statement to the effect that it did not authorise the detention of our client. We request the Panel to recommend to the Inspector General of Police in whose custody our client is to release him from custody to enable him adequately prepare his defence and attend to his failing health. We plead with the authorities to release our client from custody.”
“Our client requests that these allegations be formally served on him to enable him respond to same immediately.”
JOEBLINKS UPDATE 